‘Theory is a great aid
to clarity’ writes DeVellis (2012) when explaining the importance of keeping
scale development on track. A theory may
take form of an argument, a discussion or an explanation of an observable fact
that takes place in the world (Creswell, 2009). Quantitative research is often
aimed at testing theories as an
explanation to their questions (Creswell, 2009). Theory in a research study can
occupy a whole section in a research proposal and in a dissertation may use
multi theoretical outline (Research continuum-learning resources).
‘Hypotheses are drive
by theory’ (learning resources) and Creswell (2009) writes that in fact theory
is an ‘interrelated set’ of variables that forms into proposals and hypotheses.
This then identifies the relationship of the variables. It can be rightly said
that there can’t be a hypotheses without a theory and a theory is without a
purpose if there is no hypotheses. A hypotheses is ‘testable’ or not: this fact
depends upon a valid theory and set definitions (learning resources). Sutton
(1995) reports that ‘theory’ can be meaningless if its deterrents like
hypotheses are not applied to it. Theory is a strong component of a research
study and can be made comprehensive by reading, collecting data from past
research about the topic of interest.
It is crucial to
understand that in the relation between theory and hypotheses, a theory must be
a ‘testable theory’ (Doc sharing). A testable theory is the one that has
concepts pulled from a hypotheses and can be expressed in statistical analysis.
According to Frankfort-Nachmias & Nachmias (2008) there is no one
definition of a theory and theories can be classified according to their scope.
This is significant in research conducted by social scientists, where they are
in agreement that theory is the ‘ultimate goal’ of scientific activities but
differing views about meaning of theory.
My area of interest is
relevant to the globalization in recent times and to the ideas of cross culture
in almost every society. To make the discussion a bit updated, let me share
some facts I read about the FIFA soccer world. According to Kresting (2007) the
FIFA world cup in 2010 showed major changes from 2006 in forms of xenophobia
reduction which was suspected in Germany in 2006. The study concludes that
major sports events like the FIFA cup promote tolerance and a wider level of
multiculturalism, solidarity. This year in 2014 almost every team playing the
in the FIFA cup has players who are either immigrants or originally from a
different nation. This shows that not only in the USA, but world over the cross
culture concepts are evolving.
My research study aims
at understand the effects of being raised in a cross culture, by parents who
are immigrants or of religion, ethnicity that is a minority on children. The
study will collect data through survey research on the level of success among
first generation children of immigrants. We would then compare the data
collected to the levels of success of the peers (college age or adults) who
originate from a family, culture native to their nation.
References
Creswell, W.J. (2009). Research Design:
Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage Publications, Inc.
DeVellis,
R. F. (2012). Scale Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Publications.
Frankfort-Nachmias, C., & Nachmias, D. (2008). Research
methods in the social sciences (7th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers.
Kersting,
N. (2007). Sport and national identity: A Comparison of the 2006 and 2010 FIFA
World Cups™. Politikon, 34(3), 277-293.
Laureate
Education (2012). The Research Continuum (Walden University, PSYC 6202).
Sutton, R. I., & Staw, B. M. (1995). What theory is not. Administrative science quarterly,
371-384.
No comments:
Post a Comment